Classify AI systems with visible evidence.
A sound EU AI Act classification does not start with a label. It starts with the system purpose, involved roles, data flow and available evidence. Aegis Compact structures that work and keeps open questions visible.
Praetorian Digital OÜ · Tallinn, Estonia
Editorial responsibility: Praetorian Digital OÜ
Created:
Last reviewed:
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on EUR-Lex
System context determines the assessment.
The same model can lead to different obligations in different applications. Aegis first captures the organisation and EU connection, purpose, model and data flow, human oversight, affected people and available evidence.
Facts, assumptions and gaps remain separate.
Aegis does not automatically treat user statements as verified facts. It separates supplied evidence, declared facts, assumptions and missing evidence. A missing document is not labelled a legal breach without further review.
Four operating modes for different review stages.
- ✓
Quick Classification for an initial assessment
- ✓
System Audit for evidence registers, obligations and findings
- ✓
Guided Consultation for a structured assessment path
- ✓
Re-Audit after changes to the system, purpose, data or legal source status
The source snapshot is documented, but it is not timeless.
Aegis Compact 1.1.0 contains a pinned snapshot of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 with structured indexes covering 113 articles, 180 recitals and 13 annexes. Current primary sources, guidance and amendments must be checked before material decisions.
What Aegis does not decide.
Aegis does not provide legal advice, certification or a compliance declaration. It does not guarantee a classification or acceptance by an authority. Privacy, technical security and the actual implementation need separate reviews. Consequential legal decisions require qualified legal counsel.
Want to assess whether Aegis fits your authorised review process? Your contact details are enough for the first licence enquiry.